<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>“HLF’S DAILY DOSE OF REAL(i)TY BLOG” &#187; Bank of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/tag/bank-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Permanent loan modification refusals coming to a location near you!</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/06/01/permanent-loan-modification-refusals-coming-to-a-location-near-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/06/01/permanent-loan-modification-refusals-coming-to-a-location-near-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california real estate agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california real estate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California REO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california short sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal bailout program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loan modification program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. housing market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh how I do LOVE first tuesday. Here&#8217;s their latest take on Bank of America&#8217;s &#8220;new and improved&#8221; loan modification centers. (And, while they don&#8217;t use the word &#8216;bullshit&#8217; &#8211; which I would &#8211; they come pretty darn close!) &#8220;Six new Bank of America (BofA) mortgage help centers will be opened in Los Angeles, San [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh how I do LOVE <strong><em>first tuesday</em></strong>.  Here&#8217;s their latest take on Bank of America&#8217;s &#8220;new and improved&#8221; loan modification centers.  (And, while they don&#8217;t use the word &#8216;bullshit&#8217; &#8211; which I would &#8211; they come pretty darn close!)</p>
<p>&#8220;Six new Bank of America (BofA) mortgage help centers will be opened in Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside/San Bernardino, Antelope Valley, Modesto and Bakersfield by early summer. These new mortgage help centers will provide homeowners in danger of foreclosure on a BofA loan the ability to discuss their individual loan situations with BofA staff in hopes of obtaining the near-mythical permanent loan modification.</p>
<p>This newly-announced move comes in response to a scathing critique (full of bark, but oddly bite-less) of the Big Banks’ loose lending and servicing procedures which precipitated the Great Recession. </p>
<p>The housing counselors staffing these new mortgage help centers will be comprised largely of existing BofA employees the Big Bank is looking to redistribute during the current slowdown in loan originations. </p>
<p>But will these six new mortgage help centers actually help? The critics are skeptical. Like many Americans, the pundits have taken a “we’ll-believe-it-when-we-see-it” attitude to the multitude of reform promises made by the Big Banks. These centers, after all, aren’t changing BofA’s modus operandi; they merely provide friendlier faces for their refusals.</p>
<p>first tuesday Take: Count us as one of the critics, but don’t believe the modifications will somehow magically flow forth. Viewed in the best light, BofA is 1) providing its homeowners with a more reliable way of reaching someone who will deny their loan modification requests, and 2) giving its under-employed employees something to do. But we are talking about a bank here, so the likelihood that this move will live up to the best possible interpretation is pretty darned miniscule.</p>
<p>It’s been clear for awhile that marking all these loans to market will hugely undermine (and that’s a nice way of saying “topple”) BofA’s claim to solvency. And even if you believe BofA cares for its customers, it doesn’t care enough for them to go out of business. [For more on mark-to-market vs. mark-to-management accounting, see the October 2010 first tuesday article, Deflation’s push on the real estate recovery.]</p>
<p>So, we’ll say this for BofA: they can be congratulated on their ability to get press coverage on their staffing acuity while they avoid increasing the swollen ranks of California’s unemployed. But mortgage assistance?  Don’t count on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>From  first tuesday Journal Online — P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516</p>
<p>The Ney Work Times reported on teh story May 5.  Some of its commentary:  </p>
<p>&#8220;Just over two million homes are in foreclosure nationwide, according to LPS Mortgage Monitor, and another two million borrowers are severely delinquent. </p>
<p>Additional centers may open later this year, the bank said. Counselors fluent in languages including Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese and Russian will be available for non-English speaking customers. </p>
<p>&#8216;There are some people that prefer a face-to-face experience,&#8217; said Rebecca Mairone, national mortgage outreach executive for Bank of America. &#8216;They prefer telling their story face to face or need additional information about documents or other counseling. We’re committed to helping distressed customers.&#8217;</p>
<p>Most of the counselors in the new centers will be transferred from other areas of the mortgage business, like sales and originations, which have slowed with the decline in mortgage demand. </p>
<p>Bank of America officials said their internal foreclosure procedures had changed in the wake of public criticism, and that the centers were being opened partly in response to customer feedback.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;THERE ARE SOME PEOPLE THAT PREFER THE FACE TO FACE EXPERIENCE&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8220;WE&#8217;RE COMMITTED TO HELPING DISTRESSED CUSTOMERS&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;MOST OF THE COUNSELORS WILL BE TRANSFERRED FROM OTHER AREAS OF THE MORTGAGE BUSINESS&#8221;</p>
<p>What a crock.</p>
<p>It would have been more honest to say:  &#8220;We don&#8217;t want any more bad press so we&#8217;re not going to announce layoffs of our mortgage staff, and it&#8217;s better public relations to give our customers a face to face denial.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/06/01/permanent-loan-modification-refusals-coming-to-a-location-near-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B of A is Looking for a Few Good Men (and Women)</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/04/07/b-of-a-is-looking-for-a-few-good-men-and-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/04/07/b-of-a-is-looking-for-a-few-good-men-and-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california real estate agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the link to register for listings from BofA. Who knows&#8230; https://realestateagent.bankofamerica.com/baapp.aspx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the link to register for listings from BofA.<br />
Who knows&#8230;</p>
<p>https://realestateagent.bankofamerica.com/baapp.aspx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2011/04/07/b-of-a-is-looking-for-a-few-good-men-and-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Us Our Money</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/05/02/give-us-our-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/05/02/give-us-our-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Roth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of California homeowners is suing Bank of America, alleging that the national lender is intentionally withholding government funds intended to stave off foreclosures. The case has been filed in the U.S. District Court in Northern California; a similar lawsuit was filed in Washington state last month by the same law firm handling the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of California homeowners is suing Bank of America, alleging that the national lender is intentionally withholding government funds intended to stave off foreclosures.</p>
<p>The case has been filed in the U.S. District Court in Northern California; a similar lawsuit was filed in Washington state last month by the same law firm handling the California suit (not ours).</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://california.realestaterama.com/2010/04/08/california-homeowners-sue-bank-of-america-for-withholding-federal-bailout-funds-ID0599.html">report</a> on the suit by RealEstateRama California:</p>
<p><em>Bank of America accepted $25 billion in government bailout money financed by taxpayer dollars earmarked to help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure. One in eight mortgages in the United State is currently in foreclosure or default.</em></p>
<p><em>Bank of America, like other TARP-funded financial institutions, is obligated to offer alternatives to foreclosure and permanently reduce mortgage payments for eligible borrowers struck by financial hardship but, according to the lawsuits, hasn’t lived up to its obligation&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Bank of America continues to ignore TARP regulations and instead creates more financial pressure on homeowners, the court filing states.</em></p>
<p><em>The lawsuits charge that Bank of America intentionally postpones homeowners’ requests to modify mortgages, depriving borrowers of federal bailout funds that could save them from foreclosure. The bank ends up reaping the financial benefits provided by taxpayer dollars financing TARP-funds and also collects higher fees and interest rates associated with stressed home loans.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/05/02/give-us-our-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSVP: Yes, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/03/30/rsvp-yes-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/03/30/rsvp-yes-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Tanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Bank of America said that it would forgive some mortgage debt to help keep distressed borrowers from losing their homes. The by-invitation-only program announcement came the same week as the news that BoA had settled a suit brought by the state of Massachusetts for predatory lending. From the BoA press release announcing its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Bank of America said that it would forgive some mortgage debt to help keep distressed borrowers from losing their homes.</p>
<p>The by-invitation-only program announcement came the same week as the news that BoA had settled a suit brought by the state of Massachusetts for predatory lending.</p>
<p>From the BoA <a href="http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/index.php?s=43&amp;item=8662" target="_blank">press release</a> announcing its new Earned Principal Forgiveness program:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bank of America announced it will look first at principal forgiveness – ahead of an interest rate reduction – when modifying certain subprime, Pay-Option and prime two-year hybrid mortgages qualifying for its National Homeownership Retention Program (NHRP). Several enhancements are being made to the program, including the introduction of an earned principal forgiveness approach to modifying mortgages that are severely underwater.</p></blockquote>
<p>Basically, the program parks a maximum of 30% of the value of the loan in a special interest-free account.  As long as the homeowner continues to make payments, a percentage of the principal held in the special interest account will be forgiven each year – either until the balance is zero, or the housing market recovers and the borrower no longer has negative equity.</p>
<p>BoA is targeting delinquent homeowners whose mortgage balance is at least 20% greater than the value of their home.</p>
<p>Read the <em>New York Times</em> coverage of the announcement <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/business/25housing.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="https://exchange.dewey.exchangedefender.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=0d9ede0a795c4f8ab4dcfb4ea511adea&amp;URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.realestatelawblogca.com%2fwp-content%2fthemes%2fpremiumnews%2fimages%2fart3.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/wp-content/themes/premiumnews/images/art3.jpg</a></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.realestatelawblogca.com/2010/03/30/rsvp-yes-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

